How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2006 Clinical Practice versus Field Surgery: A Discussion of the Regulations and Logistics of Implanting Radiotransmitters in Snakes
COREY DEVIN ANDERSON, MICHAEL TALCOTT
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A major technology break in snake biology was the publication of surgical protocols for implanting radiotransmitters in the body cavities of snakes. While many researchers have reported using some variant of these protocols successfully, protocol details often vary from study to study and best-practice procedures are not easily determinable given the variety of circumstances over which studies occur. Although professional society standards and federal regulations make explicit recommendations about this surgical procedure, some of the nonstandard techniques recommended for this protocol may raise the eyebrows of institutional animal care and use committees. In this commentary we discuss regulatory and logistical aspects of the intracoelmic radiotransmitter implant procedure for snakes, and we provide a pragmatic framework for choosing among surgical variables.

COREY DEVIN ANDERSON and MICHAEL TALCOTT "Clinical Practice versus Field Surgery: A Discussion of the Regulations and Logistics of Implanting Radiotransmitters in Snakes," Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(5), 1470-1471, (1 December 2006). https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1470:CPVFSA]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 December 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
2 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
field surgery
institutional animal care and use committees
radiotelemetry
radiotransmitter
snakes
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top